Showing posts with label Emma Watson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emma Watson. Show all posts

Saturday, October 31, 2015

Halloween 2015 #13: The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975) - Jim Sharman

It took me 40 years to see this movie!
If you’re as scared of Tim Curry as I am, this is the Halloween movie for you. I also thought it would be the perfect one to finish my Horror Movie-cation with, considering this year is the 40th anniversary!
The movie starts when two white bread folks leave a friend’s wedding together. But first they declare their undying love for one another.
They then drive into the woods, get lost, and wander into a nearby castle.
I can’t even count the number of gifs of people fainting I’ve used in the past 13 reviews.
The head of the house, Frank N. Furter, is a mad scientist who has created a creature for his sexual desires.
His name is Rocky. And yes, this did come out the year before Sylvester Stallone’s Best Picture winning boxing flick.
Mayhem, sex, and violence fills the rest of this loopy narrative. Wait, I totally forgot to mention it’s a musical!
The movie was released in London to decent audiences, but then failed to raise its numbers as it expanded. It even cancelled a Halloween premiere in New York City because of the lack of success of the previous screenings.
It did, however, begin a midnight screening circuit, where a cult following developed. The rest is history! Forty years later, it is considered one of the longest running films in history, making $138 million while regularly playing in theaters across the country. The cult status was probably achieved due to the interactive nature of the viewing experience, where the audience participates in callbacks that serve as their own additional script for the film.
Sadly, my first introduction to Rocky Horror was through Glee.
And then Perks of Being a Wallflower!
Not to mention, up until last night I had seen the film twice at actual screenings without ever having finished it. But now I have! It’s crazy to see how much the film has impacted our culture. It’s absurd, carnivalesque style is regularly referenced in LGBTQ (especially Bisexual) discourse, and its celebration of the abnormal is definitely a welcomed voice in the fringes of society. But it really is just a fun and crazy movie.
Rocky doesn’t care about your heteronormative bullshit.
And, not surprisingly, Fox has decided to remake The Rocky Horror Picture Show as a two-hour TV special, helmed by Kenny Ortega (of High School Musical fame). Laverne Cox has been cast as Frank N. Furter.
I guess we’ll have to wait and see if this lives up to the original!
And thus concludes my 13 Film Horror Movie-cation! It’s been a real treat to immerse myself in the exciting world of horror cinema this month, and now I’m definitely ready for Halloween!

Saturday, October 3, 2015

The Bling Ring (2013) - Sofia Coppola

So I saw The Bling Ring today, which is kind of cool because I just found out it only came out in NYC and LA this weekend, and it comes out everywhere else next weekend. If you’ve been too wrapped up in Man of Steel, Ironman 3, and Star Trek, you probably haven’t noticed these little indie treasures slipping into the box office and making quiet splashes of viewing pleasure. The Bling Ring is definitely one of them. Sofia Coppola, the Oscar winning director behind Lost In Translation (2003) and Marie Antoinette (2006), has made a film based on the true story of the Hollywood Hills Burglar Bunch, a group of teens who stole $3 million worth of belongings from celebrities from 2008-2009. 
image
If there is ever a more interesting true story that captures our generation’s obsession with pop culture more perfectly, I’d love to hear about it. Because this movie is a fun, exciting look at a group of teenagers committing crimes that only our generation could commit. They follow celebrity gossip to see which celebrities are out of town, google their addresses, study the Google Map Street View, and then head to the house to break in. And what can I say? It’s just very entertaining to watch these kids devolve into the obsessed fame whores that they really are.
image
The story is told basically in flashback, as some of the teens recount their experiences to court judges, psychiatrists, and magazine interviewers. Sofia Coppola said she found out about the story from a 2010 Vanity Fair article, which chronicled the kids’ adventures, entitled “The Suspect Wore Louboutins.” The main story follows Marc, a gay kid starting at a new school who meets his first friend, Rebecca. He gets wrapped up in her obsessive kleptomaniac lifestyle, and before long the two of them are breaking into the houses of Paris Hilton and Audrina Patridge. Rebecca invites three of her friends into their circle of crime, one played by Emma Watson, and another played by American Horror Story’s Taissa Farmiga. The five of them steal from Paris Hilton, Audrina Patridge, Rachel Bilson, Orlando Bloom, and Lindsay Lohan, until they are finally caught by the police.
image
And to Emma Watson’s credit, I honestly believe she carried the film. Her American accent in Perks of Being a Wallflower (2012) wasn’t fantastic, but she captured this southern Californian valley girl voice really well, and her superficiality in the face of all of this crime really lifted the movie out of just seeming like a dumb, glossy biopic of these kids’ crimes.
image
Apparently, to get in character, she watched a lot of The Hills and Keeping Up With The Kardashians. What I found so interesting about this group is that they idolized not actors, but lifestyle icons. They quickly become engrossed in the club lifestyle of Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan, the ring-leader Rebecca’s biggest idols. All of the girls’ rooms have collages of these kinds of pop culture icons on the walls, and there’s a strange fascination they all have with the celebrities that do nothing but act as symbols for opulence and excess.
image
A lot of Sofia Coppola’s detractors complain that her movies look like stylized, pretty music videos with no substance. But in this movie, that sort of tone is perfect for what she is trying to show. These girls have almost no depth, they seek notoriety and they achieve it, no matter what the costs. Most of them actually look excited to be in the spotlight once they are caught, especially Emma’s character, Nicki. My favorite scene in the film is when Nicki is being interviewed for the famous Vanity Fair feature, and she plays the victim and talks about how she wasn’t actually involved in the crimes. And to her credit, the real life character she is based on was said to have been very drunk or high on cocaine during most of the robberies.
image
Another interesting point the film makes is how much the parents play a factor in these kids’ aggressive reach for material wealth. Nicki’s mother, played by Leslie Mann, is a spiritual but misguided homeschool teacher who uses Angelina Jolie as an example of perfect values and ideal behavior. She pushes Nicki, who wants to start a career in the fashion world. In fact, all of the characters talk about how they want their “own lines” some day. They want people to emulate THEIR style, and they project themselves onto people like Audrina Patridge and Paris Hilton. And the only voice of reason throughout the film seems to be Marc, who realizes too late that he had befriended a psychotic, celebrity-obsessed girl bent on achieving that lifestyle. At one point, a security tape of them stealing from Audrina Patridge ends up TMZ, and he urges the girls to stop, but they refuse.
image
Also, another great part about the film is that Paris Hilton is actually in it. She is shown at the same club they go to, and the scenes where they steal from her are actually filmed at her house. You see the rooms full of jewelry, the private club with an actual stripper pole, and the entire wing of the house just filled with designer clothes. It makes the movie very real, and definitely explains why it took Paris five robberies to even figure out it was happening.
image
I’m not sure if it’s my personal obsession with pop culture, or my sense that the film had captured a certain dark side of our generation so poignantly, but the film really stood out to me. My only wish is that it had been longer, because when we meet Rebecca, she’s already stealing from cars for the fun of it, and we know absolutely nothing about her family life. Maybe that’s the point though, that Sofia Coppola wants us to believe that anyone can be swept up by the allure of the celebrity lifestyle, and driven to absolute insanity. Regardless, I commend both Sofia Coppola and Emma Watson on this great film.

Iron Man 3 (2013) - Shane Black

As my summer movie list becomes longer than the number of days in summer, I start to wonder how Phineas and Ferb get everything done. But yesterday I did manage to see both Iron Man 3 and Star Trek Into Darkness, and I loved both of them. 
image
I know. And honestly, I had high hopes. Iron Man 2 was… forgettable, and Marvel/Disney had a lot to live up to in this post-Avengers period of their superhero films. Seeing as this was the first one since Avengers, they set the film up with a sort of existential crisis that Tony Stark is having after going through the vortex. At points it was heavy handed but in general it gave the emotional depth the film needed to keep from being boring and uninvolved. And I want to give a huge amount of credit for the film’s success to Robert Downey Jr. 
image
We just love Tony Stark. He’s egotistical, superficial, but dangerously intelligent and very loving towards Pepper. His cynicism and sarcastic quips make him hilarious to watch and lift the story beyond just another superhero film. And in one summer with almost five superhero films (Iron Man 3, Thor 2, Man of Steel, Wolverine, technically Percy Jackson 2…), each movie needs to do everything in its power to stand out. 
image
And Iron Man 3 definitely had its clichéd superhero movie moments, but it did them with an originality that I think comes form Tony Stark’s “I don’t really know what I’m doing but I actually have a plan” kind of attitude. He always seems to be outnumbered, or outsmarted, but then suddenly he’ll whip out 40 plus Iron Man suits that run without human bodies and can fight as a little army for him.
image
And you can’t help but geek out a little when all of the suits are revealed. Because you realize that no one can beat Tony Stark, he’s just TOO good. I just did this in the theater at this scene.
image
The film is told as a story, where Tony Stark reflects on his mistake he made in 1999, when he didn’t join up with a (mad)scientist who wanted to genetically engineer super humans that could regenerate their bodies after injuries. The plot is familiar (X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Captain America, Star Trek Into Darkness), but Iron Man 3 made it complicated, it made it confusing. And it certainly tested Tony Stark in a way that I think the other two movies failed to. In Iron Man 1, he has to build the suit to survive, and then has to fight an even bigger version of the suit. In Iron Man 2… (to Wikipedia!) Iron Man has to figure out how to find Vanka and eventually has to fight a bunch of drones before fighting Vanka in his own arc-powered suit. But this one didn’t involve a villain getting his hands on an Iron Man suit, but a villain that almost took Stark down with terrorism and going for what matters, Pepper Potts.
image
Not only did Stark have serious PTSD, but it also went into the subplot of how Tony Stark saw himself, as just a filling for the Iron Man suit, or as a man simply wearing a suit of armor. This movie is about Tony Stark understanding who he is and where Iron Man plays into that being, which is what makes the ending so perfect. The film is exciting, hilarious, and this review isn’t doing it justice at all. Everyone should go see it.