Showing posts with label Silver Linings Playbook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Silver Linings Playbook. Show all posts

Saturday, October 3, 2015

Silver Linings Playbook (2012) - David O. Russell

Last weekend I watched Silver Linings Playbook for the second time. I saw it in theaters in December, and this was my first time seeing it after Jennifer Lawrence won an Oscar for her portrayal of Tiffany Maxwell in the film.
image
So David O. Russell is a well known writer/director, having been nominated for Best Directing for 2010’s The Fighter. He originally wanted the leading roles of the film to be Zooey Deschanel and Vince Vaughn, and later switched to Mark Wahlberg, and then finally settled on Bradley Cooper to play the lead, Pat Solitano. For Tiffany, he cast Anne Hathaway, and then lost her to The Dark Knight Rises. He auditioned a myriad of women, everyone from Kirsten Dunst to Angelina Jolie. He agreed to allow Jennifer Lawrence (who was 21 at the time) to audition, but knew he wasn’t going to give it to her because Bradley Cooper was 37 and thought it would be weird. After seeing her audition he realized she was the right one for the role.
image
The movie is a romantic comedy-drama, telling the story of how two people who are considered mentally “messed up” fall in love. Pat is released from a court ordered mental hospital sentence in the opening scene, which funnily enough was in Baltimore. The words “I don’t want to go back to Baltimore” were in the film several times, and made me laugh because I know the feeling.
But Pat lives in Delaware County, Pennsylvania (another place I have lived), and moves in with his mom (Jacki Weaver) and his dad (Robert De Niro) at the start of the film. We find out from some therapy sessions that Pat came home to find his wife in the shower with another man, a school teacher the two of them both worked with. He beat the man almost to death, got arrested, and got a restraining order from his wife.
Even if Pat’s life seems a little miserable at the start, he is actually the most positive in the film. He maintains this outlook:
image
I found Pat’s positive outlook to be misguided though. What Pat wants more than anything is his wife back, and he believes that impressing her and fixing all of what she considered to be his flaws is how he will be happy and win her back. That’s why the character of Tiffany is exactly what Pat needs in his life.
Tiffany is a recent widow whose husband died being hit by a car. We never find out her age but if I had to guess I would say mid 20s. Her sister (Julia Stiles) throws a dinner party for Pat and invites Tiffany, and the two certainly don’t hit it off. But when Pat’s therapist suggests he can impress his wife by helping Tiffany, Pat agrees to commit to performing with Tiffany in a dance competition she entered.
The secret to the film is that everyone is secretly messed up. Pat’s dad has undiagnosed OCD, which manifests itself in how he watches Eagles games, by demanding specific details to be in order such as where the remotes are placed and who sits where. Pat’s best friend unknowingly hates his marriage and thinks making his wife happy will make him happy. It seems Pat and Tiffany are the only ones who have it figured out MOST of the time.
image
But as interesting as the storyline is, it refuses to break out of the romantic comedy formula, which I found to be its biggest flaw. Boy meets girl, they butt heads, a connection through some external force brings them together (with a montage sequence showing them falling in love), boy breaks girl’s heart through a misunderstanding, boy chases after girl, boy delivers this line to win her back:
image
And they live happily ever after. For a film that pushes boundaries in terms of what our society thinks about mental disorders, it certainly is cautious about pushing boundaries in terms of the “normal” love story. 
However, I can’t hate on the film for being cliché, because Jennifer Lawrence and Bradley Cooper’s chemistry is so emotional and electrifying that you’re laughing and crying in every one of their conversations. image
The film definitely tests our theories about what makes us happy and how much of that is our own doing. And in that way it succeeds in its goal, and I can see why it got all the praise it did.

Argo (2012) - Ben Affleck

So I’ve seen Lincoln, Silver Linings Playbook, and Les Miz. I’ve decided that none of them are in the running to win Best Picture tomorrow night, so I decided to finally sit myself down and watch the real frontrunner, Argo.
I don’t know what it is about this movie. It won Best Drama at the Golden Globes, Best Cast at the Screen Actors Guild Awards, it won the Director’s Guild Award, the Producer’s Guild Award, Best Picture at the BAFTAs, and the Critics Choice Awards Best Picture. This film is DOMINATING Awards Season. It’s a clear favorite for the Academy Awards, and I don’t think anything can stop its momentum. I feel bad for the other movies, but who knows, anything can happen at the Oscars. But if any of the other films win, Ben Affleck will run on stage and say this line:
image
I thought Argo was going to be specifically about the 1979 Iranian Hostage Crisis. I thought, why on earth would I want to watch a historical movie about political turmoil in the middle east? (I didn’t want to watch Lincoln either, and I still haven’t seen Zero Dark Thirty). But the film actually specifically follows the “Canadian Caper,” a popularized name for the CIA operation in which six U.S. diplomats who had escaped the American Embassy in Tehran, Iran on the day the Iranian Hostage Crisis began were saved by CIA agent Tony Mendez because of a fake movie he used to get them out, entitled “Argo.” Now that my run-on sentences are over, I can talk about my opinion of the movie.
The story is compelling, intense, and entertaining, which didn’t surprise me at all considering how many awards it has already won. Ben Affleck manages to make an event that is probably still sensitive to some Americans (not Zero Dark Thirty sensitive, but still, controversial) and turn it into a fictionalized drama that has you on the edge of your seat. For the first half of the movie, the film stresses “this mission is extremely dangerous.” The CIA considers a plethora of ideas on how to get the diplomats out of Iran. Weirdly enough, the film hardly cares to follow the 52 Americans that were held captive in the American Embassy in Tehran for a STAGGERING 444 days by Iranian students and militants (yeah I do my research). But I think this specific mission gave the film a lighter, more goal-oriented tone. And I liked that.
image
Another thing I loved is that the film had John Goodman. You probably recognize him as this.
image
Another awesome thing about John Goodman is that if Argo wins, he’ll have been in two Best Picture winners in a row (he played Al Zimmer in The Artist). Good for him!
Anyway, the film was much more entertaining than I expected, and it also goes into the crazy stuff involved in making a film! Affleck’s character uses Goodman’s character as well as another character played by Alan Arkin to be the Hollywood producers to help him plan the film out. They have a real script, a real producer, and use real marketing to make the film as legitimate as possible for the Iranian government to believe them. Affleck goes in with stories and identities for each of the six diplomats, and the seven of them leave together as a film crew that is scouting a science fiction film in Iran. The whole process is nail-biting, jaw-dropping, and even funny at times. But I am not kidding when I say you will look like this the entire movie.
image
And when they finally get on the plane to go home, but even more intense drama is thrown into the scene:
image
I had a great time watching it, and I’m glad I finally got around to it. Do I think it deserves Best Picture? Meh… I’ll accept it if it does, but I wouldn’t have voted for it myself.