Showing posts with label Reese Witherspoon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reese Witherspoon. Show all posts

Saturday, October 10, 2015

Halloween 2015 #4: American Psycho (2000) - Mary Harron

A film by a female director!! I’m pretty sure this is the third film I’ve reviewed that is solely directed by a woman, after The Bling Ring (Sofia Coppola) and Sassy Pants (Coley Sohn). Out of 84 reviews! 
image
That’s me being sarcastic.
So American Psycho, based on the novel by Bret Easton Ellis, tells the story of a Wall Street businessman, Patrick Bateman, who is also a serial killer. His douchey self-obsessed world of investment banking clashes with his murderous tendencies, and soon his world begins to fall apart as his taste for blood grows stronger.
image
His first murder, a homeless man, is a manifestation of his belief that he is superior to people who aren’t as wealthy as he is, and those who don’t contribute to society deserve to die. It’s sick and nasty and very un-Batman. 
image
He dates Evelyn (Reese Witherspoon), despite the fact that they both cheat on each other with their other rich friends.
His interactions with his coworkers are always very strange, I felt like I was being forced to watch an overplayed pissing contest repeatedly. The characters obsess over each other’s business cards, despite the fact that they are essentially indistinguishable (even with the same title, Vice President). 
image
Bateman also keeps to his rigorous skin care and workout regimens, emphasizing the connection between physical superiority and supposed worth as a human being. The more Bateman sees himself as a brilliant albeit sociopathic individual, the easier his killings become.
image
Also Bateman’s bizarre relationship with music is interesting, because the early murder scenes are preceded by long, drawn out explanations of artists that he enjoys. He regularly prefers famous musician’s later albums to their previous ones (both Phil Collins and Whitney Houston are used as examples), which could possibly be a reference to how famous serial killers usually take a few tries to really find their own… style?
image
Bateman casually quotes serial killers, once with his friends when he talks about how Ed Guin viewed women in both a romantic and in a future victim sense, and then later he references Ted Bundy in front of his secretary, played by Chloƫ Sevigny.
image
I’m sorry I just keep jumping off on tangents, but I also think it’s important to talk about the way the film relates sex, violence, and vanity. Bateman is self-obsessed, and here we see him preferring to look at himself having sex rather than at the woman. He’s pretty much incapable of viewing her as a human (she’s an escort), and later he… well we don’t know exactly what he does. He is violent in some way, but he pays her and she leaves, so we’re unsure. Although he does make a porn with her and a prostitute, because Bateman loves porn. He’s always returning videotapes.
image
Anyway now that I’ve briefly touched on some of the subtext I noticed, I can address the ending. The violence escalates until Bateman reaches some sort of psychological breaking point, and then things get a little… crazy. His desire to kill becomes uncontrollable, and it seems almost certain that he will be punished. But the film has other ideas. You have to watch it to see what I mean. 
image
Or read the book, I don’t know. It’s only been about half a day since I watched it, so I don’t really know how I feel just yet. My gut reaction was “What the what?” and my brain was kind of like, “Let it sink in and try not to overanalyze.” Basically, if you want Wolf of Wall Street meets Dexter, this is for you. Everything Christian Bale says is cringeworthy but also dripping with irony, satirizing capitalism and materialism and everything about Wall Street. So that part is good.

Saturday, October 3, 2015

Day 15: January 17th, 2014: 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) - Stanley Kubrick

I am upset that I am a day late with this last review, but I still saw it on the right date. The 15th and last film on my list (I have some more classics I want to see this week but I’m already back at school) is actually the third Stanley Kubrick film I’ve seen in the past 6 months. I saw A Clockwork Orange in July, The Shining in December, and now this!
The film is different from the other two in so many ways, but I found it more interesting to spot the similarities. For instance, it resembled A Clockwork Orange in that there was a moment maybe 30 to 45 minutes in the film where you go “Oh… so THIS is the plot.” And it reminded me of The Shining because there were massive amounts of time without dialogue. Both of those things are hard to pull off without losing the audience’s attention, so 2001 makes up for it with incredible visual imagery and insane special effects.
Half the time I was thinking “Isn’t this 1968? How do they do that?” It takes a conscious effort to be impressed by the visual effects in the film, because I have to remind myself just how old this movie is. 45 years before Gravity (2013), 9 years before Star Wars (1977), Stanley Kubrick is doing things no one thought possible in film. And that’s how I kept my interest, because the plot is about as slow as you can imagine.
There is no dialogue for the first and last 20 minutes of the film. The above gif is from the first section of the film, where a group of early hominids deal with the struggles of not having iPhones. Then a black monolith appears one day, and it has an impact of the evolution of the group. Flash forward a few million years, to 2000, and a group of astronauts are getting ready to go to the moon to visit another black monolith that was discovered.
The rest of the film focuses on two astronauts and their supercomputer, HAL 9000, on a mission to Jupiter. They aren’t told much about their mission, and things kind of just go crazy from there.
I was a bit more bored than I thought I’d be, but I blame that on the evolution of movies to fill every second with mesmerizing images so that our tiny attention spans don’t wander. When I put the film into the perspective of its time, what I see is a masterpiece with high critical praise and a groundbreaking use of special effects.
2001: A Space Odyssey is #110 on the IMDb Top 250, but way up at #15 for the AFI 100 Movies. It won one Oscar, for Best Visual Effects, which actually is Stanley Kubrick’s only Oscar.
That concludes my 15th movie review in “15” days. I got through my entire winter movie bucket-list!