So I realized last night when I stated that my theme was “Directors who always come up in conversation but whose films I’ve never seen,” it was basically a complete lie. Last night I saw my fourth Hitchcock film, after Shadow of a Doubt (1943), Psycho (1960), and Vertigo (1958). So let’s get started!
The story focuses on a man named L.B. Jefferies, who is confined to his room after his photography job caused him to get in an accident at the racetrack, where he broke his leg. He is played by James Stewart, the same as the protagonist from Vertigo (and It’s A Wonderful Life, which just failed to make my last list). He is stubborn, intellectual, and a bit pretentious. He spends most of his time spying on his neighbors through their windows.
His girlfriend is Lisa, played by Grace Kelly. This was actually my first Grace Kelly movie ever, which was exciting. So Lisa is basically the opposite of Jeff, she comes from an upper class background and she sells designer clothes and enjoys her lavish lifestyle. In the beginning of the film we find out Jeff is reluctant to marry her because she is “too perfect.”
Which the sassy nurse explains is stupid.
So Jeff has a neighbor living across the courtyard who has a wife that is an invalid, and one day the man is acting super suspicious, and the next day his wife is gone. He call his detective friend, who assures him that murder is not the answer. They soon begin investigating, and each piece of evidence assures the detective that the man’s wife went to stay in the country, but Jeff, Lisa, and the nurse don’t buy it.
The film is very funny at times, because it shows how glimpses into people’s private lives can be so misleading. Other critics have argued that each couple that Jeff spies on is a potential path for Lisa and Jeff’s relationship, and that’s why he is so hesitant to propose. Also Jeff has some pretty interesting neighbors, including this ballerina who has never heard of blinds before.
Anyway, the film, in typical mid-20th century fashion, is incredibly slow to start up. But Hitchcock knows his audience, and he certainly knows suspense, and I think the payoff was worth it. It had me like:
So I recommend that everyone take the time to see it. The film ranks #31 on the IMDb Top 250, and #48 on the AFI 100 Movies list. It’s no Psycho, but on the bright side it also didn’t make me afraid to shower.
This is the trailer for the film “The Impossible” which is in theaters now. I actually just got back from it so I’m writing this while I’m in “the movie mood.” It’s a state of being where you can still feel the emotions that a movie you just saw created in you and you can’t stop thinking about it. It’s probably not a very objective way to write a film review, but here goes.
“The Impossible” is a disaster drama by director Juan Antonio Bayona (2007’s “The Orphanage”). The film was released in Spain in October 2012, but it wasn’t released in the United States until January 4th, 2013. With the Academy Award nominations being announced tomorrow, and my obsession with award show season growing by the minute (it’s actually becoming a problem), I am so excited for this film to do well both commercially and critically.
Because of my experience with the trailer, I knew the film had very little time to actually introduce the pre-tsunami Bennet family. There’s Maria and Henry, the parents, and sons Lucas, Thomas, and Simon. Henry is some kind of businessman in Japan, and Maria was a doctor before she had her kids and Henry got a job a Japan. The film makes the family clearly British, even though the family the film is about is Spanish. Bayona said that he wanted to make the film as universal as possible by not specifying the nationality of the Bennet family. So the family is British. Who doesn’t love British accents?
Because Taylor Swift and Harry Styles just broke up. Anyway, the story is extremely moving in a much more “in your face” way than Les Miz was. Maria (played by Naomi Watts) and the oldest son, Lucas, find each other early on, and they have to deal with serious injuries as well as the decision to go to a hospital instead of looking for the rest of their family. Meanwhile, Henry (Ewan McGregor) finds his two younger sons, and the three of them struggle with finding help or looking for their loved ones. But their plot is definitely secondary to the moving and powerful tale of the mother and her son. I saw the film with my mom, which was basically the equivalent of a mother and daughter seeing “Brave” together. But also throw in the fact that no teenage boy wants to cry in front of his mom.
The film deals with compassion, familial love, and human nature in a way that is surprisingly accessible to someone who has never dealt with anything near this scale. Along with that, it captures both the mass hysteria and the humanistic companionship that comes with surviving a tragedy like this one. There’s an especially touching scene where Lucas and his mother are wandering through the wreckage, and they hear a boy crying. Lucas argues that they need to get to higher ground, but Maria makes a case for why they have to save him. She posits “what if it were Thomas or Simon?” even though she knows it isn’t. They end up saving him and in the end we see the boy reunited with his family. Meanwhile I’m like
I can’t say it enough. The film is seriously powerful. Naomi Watts certainly deserved her Golden Globe nomination for Best Actress in a Drama, and I think Ewan McGregor and Tom Holland (who played the oldest son Lucas) deserved one as well. There’s something about the way Tom Holland handles his character that is really moving, and I have a feeling we’ll be seeing him soon again.
There’s a scene where Ewan McGregor’s character is taken to a shelter after spending all night looking for his wife and son, and he is sitting around a group of survivors telling their stories. A man gives Henry a phone to call his kids’ grandfather, and he tells him that him and his two sons are alright, but that he can’t find his wife and son. He hangs up because he breaks down, and the group forces him to call the grandfather back (at a time where cellphone battery is more valuable than everyone’s material possessions combined) to tell them that he will keep looking for his loved ones. It’s emotional and heartbreaking and there wasn’t a person in the theater not sniffling.
I have to give the award for “most heartbreaking scene” to when Maria first emerges from the water. It takes her a moment to realize what has happened, and she then breaks down. The full force of the water rushing past her is nothing compared to the thought of her having lost her family. She cries out and every audience member understood what it was like to be confronted with being truly alone in such a devastating way.
I highly recommend that anyone with a functioning heart goes to see this film. I know that awards season consists of the meteor shower of intense emotional films, where comedies are few and far between, but this movie is truly inspiring. I’ll admit it, by the end I looked like this.
I saw Alien for my film class just a few months ago, and when I noticed that Aliens was on my bucket list, I realized that it couldn’t be more fitting for my first film of the year. So I dug through my parents’ movies and whipped out the… yes… VHS of Aliens. And as I plugged the VCR player into my projector and began the rewinding process, I started some preliminary research.
The 1986 remake of the famous Ridley Scott film, Alien, came a whopping seven years after its predecessor. 20th Century Fox felt the film hadn’t been enough of a commercial success for a sequel, even though our now famous Avatar and Titanic director James Cameron had come to them with an interest in spearheading a sequel as early as 1983. The studio basically told him that he could only make it if his current project, The Terminator, was a success.
About 78 million dollars later, Cameron was given the green light. After a few disputes between Cameron, Fox, and the actress playing the first film’s heroine and only survivor, Sigourney Weaver, it was decided that the film would follow a similar formula to the critically successful and Oscar winning (well… Best Visual Effects) Alien.
Because of the familiar background and characters that the second film begins with, I feel compelled to immediately compare the two. The idea of “Ridley Scott vs. James Cameron” stuck with me the entire time I watched it, and that perspective actually helped me see some interesting distinctions in not only storytelling but also in directing style. The second film kept the same basic “anti-establishment” theme as the first one, but took it in its own direction that is not only imaginative, but also satisfying as a fan of the first one. The big business of the Weyland-Yutani Corporation is immediately cast as the corrupt and greedy force of the film, a similar thread to the first film that famously declared its employees “expendable” in comparison to the specimen they wanted from the alien planet. While Ripley, Sigourney’s character, seems to be the only level-headed person left in the world she now inhabits, she is labeled as mentally unstable about five minutes into the film. While post-traumatic stress disorder certainly fits due to her frequent nightmares about an alien clawing out of her stomach, pathological lying is not in her arsenal.
What really separates this film from the second one is that it dives right into the action. Ridley Scott takes painstaking time to set up the mass mayhem that takes place aboard the spaceship Nostromo, which is the kind of psychological horror film that I enjoy. This time around, Cameron is entirely aware that the audience has already seen the creature and expects to pick up basically where the last film left off in our understanding of the planet.
Another thing I picked up on was an uncanny similarity to Avatar, which kind of made me feel like Cameron had been stringing us along for decades (well, not me in particular) until the release of his biggest work to date. There are robots that humans control (those big Transformer-looking things used to lift materials or fight blue aliens), a manipulative and greedy corporation that plans to stop at nothing to get what it wants, and Sigourney Weaver fighting for the good guys.
iThe premise of the film is unique in the way a sequel should be, but also close enough to the original to keep our interest. When Ripley put herself to sleep at the end of the first film, she expected to awake a short while later on earth. Instead, fifty-seven years later, Ripley is found with her ship drifting through space aimlessly. She is deemed insane for her stories about the alien, and soon finds out that several dozen humans now populate the planet where her entire crew was killed. But shortly after, earth loses contact with the planet and the corporation realizes that Ripley might have been right. They send her to the planet with a ragtag team of marines in hopes of finding any survivors. They find a small girl living in the garbage shoot, whose name is Newt but reminds me too much of Cosette to call her anything else. The marines then find out that the tracking devices on the humans all point to one room, and when they get there it turns out to be the hive of the aliens.
As soon as the action really got started, and the aliens killed all of the characters whose names I hadn’t yet bothered to learn, the deeper plots really got rolling. The group is trapped in one corner of the planet’s colony, with walls of automatic weapons set to destroy any oncoming aliens. The character of Burke, who is the embodiment of the corporation, shows his true colors when he locks Ripley and Newt in a room with two of the “impregnating” aliens that lay the eggs in a host’s stomach. Burke thought he could sneak the aliens back to earth in Ripley and Newt’s stomachs, but he dies minutes later when the surviving marines’ barricade is invaded.
I don’t want to mention any spoilers, but basically the movie has a fantastic ending that stays true to the first film but also adds the interesting twist that Ripley isn’t the only one to survive! Aliens ranks at #58 on the IMDB Top 250, as compared to #40 for Alien, although the sequel has 100% on Rotten Tomatoes while the first has 97%. Overall, I definitely plan on seeing the next two in the franchise, and couldn’t recommend them more highly to anyone who is interested in seeing a classic science fiction thriller directed by the man who brought you Titanic.